ilikekilo
07-23 07:24 AM
not sure where you got taht info..i believe u still can...pl contact ur lawyer...or post question on immilaw website..
wallpaper it#39;s is just another word.
Cathy_P
January 3rd, 2005, 09:59 PM
Lovely!
amjun
02-10 09:36 AM
No need to pay taxes to India. I was grad student for 6 years and never paid a rupee to Indian tax authorities. Whoever got a letter from Indian IT for taxes on US income needs to see an Indian tax consultant.
2011 a word or symbol having …
vamsi_poondla
02-04 08:41 PM
You can convert GC process to Consular Processing. AFAIK, that is the most lgal way of working outside the country in your situation.
more...
glus
03-28 08:39 AM
Last year CIR expired. Yes, senate must pass its own version of the bill. It could be that it will be a very similar to CIR from last year. If only house passes its own bill, and no senate bill is passed, there is no new law. Both chambers must act in order to create a new binding law.
sheela
12-01 01:53 AM
I got an RFE to send copies of my degrees on nov 15th. my attorney sent the copies and my status changed to Response to request for evidence received and processing is resumed. How many days will it take for I-140 approval after the response to RFE to received by USCIS ?
It should be few days not weeks. BTW did your attorney charge money for responding to RFE?
It should be few days not weeks. BTW did your attorney charge money for responding to RFE?
more...
Blog Feeds
06-28 03:30 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
In McDonald v. Chicago, The Supreme Court reasserted today that individuals have the right to retain guns at both the State and Local levels. The Majority consisting of conservative justices---- Alito, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy based their decision on the history of the second Amendment, where militias were given the right to protect their farmlands. At that time we had no organized police force, we had no justice system in place.
Who are the militias of today? The KKK-- the uneducated people, who generally do not work, collect welfare checks, and blame all their owes on the colored people and now the "illegal immigrants."
If the Supreme Court grants the right to local levels to enact gun controls, one can only speculate for instance what kind of gun control laws Maricopa COunty in Arizona will enact.
Due Process protects every "individual"; it does not say "citizens". And just like every individual has the right to protect themselves with weapons, every individuals also have the more fundamental right to live.
Although the justices said that the Second Amendment allows for a reasonable restriction of guns, their rationale based on history of the second Amendment gives the militias a carte blanche right to bear arms. This can indeed set a dangerous precedence.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-3007429105780062622?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/06/second-amendment.html)
In McDonald v. Chicago, The Supreme Court reasserted today that individuals have the right to retain guns at both the State and Local levels. The Majority consisting of conservative justices---- Alito, Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy based their decision on the history of the second Amendment, where militias were given the right to protect their farmlands. At that time we had no organized police force, we had no justice system in place.
Who are the militias of today? The KKK-- the uneducated people, who generally do not work, collect welfare checks, and blame all their owes on the colored people and now the "illegal immigrants."
If the Supreme Court grants the right to local levels to enact gun controls, one can only speculate for instance what kind of gun control laws Maricopa COunty in Arizona will enact.
Due Process protects every "individual"; it does not say "citizens". And just like every individual has the right to protect themselves with weapons, every individuals also have the more fundamental right to live.
Although the justices said that the Second Amendment allows for a reasonable restriction of guns, their rationale based on history of the second Amendment gives the militias a carte blanche right to bear arms. This can indeed set a dangerous precedence.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-3007429105780062622?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/06/second-amendment.html)
2010 Just Another Word.
gcloner
04-15 01:00 AM
You need to bring more clarity in your questions. Has your GC been approved and you are waiting for it to arrive in mail? or it is still pending approval. You do not need any visa to leave US. You will need it to get back in.
Be more clear in your questions and someone will reply.
sorry bout that. gc is still pending in NSC for approval.. had my valid h4... can i still use it incase i stayed in my country for like 7 mos. and gc was approved right after i left the US, can i still go back here in the US with just the valid h4????
Be more clear in your questions and someone will reply.
sorry bout that. gc is still pending in NSC for approval.. had my valid h4... can i still use it incase i stayed in my country for like 7 mos. and gc was approved right after i left the US, can i still go back here in the US with just the valid h4????
more...
Blog Feeds
07-07 08:10 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
hair medusa is another word for
jambapamba
07-23 07:53 AM
I just read somewhere...that if I do not file by I140 by July 31 the i lose chance to file I485 by august 17..which i could file anyway together if I have to file it by July31..Is this true..
the reason being that I am waiting for the hard copy of Labor Approval and the only thing I have is Cover letter copy..I do not want to miss chance
My PD is Oct 2001
Please please let me know!!
DB
I think its only for labor exempt cases. Since your PD is 2001...u r fine to file by aug17th
Some people here say LC must be cleared by July 31st...so u r fine that way too. Your LC will say a approval date in July...so u r ok...(eventhough some argue that its not important)
the reason being that I am waiting for the hard copy of Labor Approval and the only thing I have is Cover letter copy..I do not want to miss chance
My PD is Oct 2001
Please please let me know!!
DB
I think its only for labor exempt cases. Since your PD is 2001...u r fine to file by aug17th
Some people here say LC must be cleared by July 31st...so u r fine that way too. Your LC will say a approval date in July...so u r ok...(eventhough some argue that its not important)
more...
saibaba
12-01 05:04 PM
H1 and H4 are 2 different classes.
thanks for the info...
I have to attend for H1 visa renewal...means I got extended H1 handy and All I have to do is get it stamped in chennai...
I was under the impression that i'm gonna take my wife along with me by adding another application to the selected date/time slot of mine....which they recommend in general..
if h1 and h4 belongs to two different classes how can I tie them together when selecting another applicant after filling those online 156 and 157's?
any thoughts?..
I'm sure many of the folks here wld have coem across this scenario as it invloves H4 - H1 stamping stuff...
can someone pls advise me...thanx in advance...
thanks for the info...
I have to attend for H1 visa renewal...means I got extended H1 handy and All I have to do is get it stamped in chennai...
I was under the impression that i'm gonna take my wife along with me by adding another application to the selected date/time slot of mine....which they recommend in general..
if h1 and h4 belongs to two different classes how can I tie them together when selecting another applicant after filling those online 156 and 157's?
any thoughts?..
I'm sure many of the folks here wld have coem across this scenario as it invloves H4 - H1 stamping stuff...
can someone pls advise me...thanx in advance...
hot With word puzzle, funny.
gsc999
04-03 01:33 AM
bump
more...
house a word out of my name.
kingpin60
07-16 04:08 PM
Hi everyone,
Here is my situation and I need URGENT help.
I am currently on L1-A for past 7 years (Visa expires Nov 07). During this span my company's attorney has unsuccessfully filed my I140 (twice was rejected at NSC and later TSC - due to 3 year degree and also my job description prior to transfer to US did not showed I have managerial/management function of a department). He refiled again this time with proper documentation and additional support letters from senior exec from my company.
I suspect he has been making mistakes in my filing and my time is running out. I am thinking of using my own money and hire another lawyer to file a fresh I140/485. Is this possible since I have already 2 pending I140; one at NSC under EB-1C and another at TSC under EB-3?
Please reply urgently if anyone has the answer to my question as I am running out of time.
Thanks in advance.
Here is my situation and I need URGENT help.
I am currently on L1-A for past 7 years (Visa expires Nov 07). During this span my company's attorney has unsuccessfully filed my I140 (twice was rejected at NSC and later TSC - due to 3 year degree and also my job description prior to transfer to US did not showed I have managerial/management function of a department). He refiled again this time with proper documentation and additional support letters from senior exec from my company.
I suspect he has been making mistakes in my filing and my time is running out. I am thinking of using my own money and hire another lawyer to file a fresh I140/485. Is this possible since I have already 2 pending I140; one at NSC under EB-1C and another at TSC under EB-3?
Please reply urgently if anyone has the answer to my question as I am running out of time.
Thanks in advance.
tattoo That#39;s a funny word: enter.
Prashanthi
02-11 04:20 PM
You are allowed to maintain your H-1 while travelling on Advance Parole, this is an exception to the general rule.
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 00051801 (posted May. 18, 2000)"
U.S. Department of Justice
Immigration and Naturalization Service
HQADJ 70/ 2.8.6, 2.8.12, 10.18
AD 00-03
May 16, 2000
MEMORANDUM FOR:
REGIONAL DIRECTORS
SERVICE CENTER DIRECTORS
DISTRICT DIRECTORS
OFFICERS IN CHARGE
ASYLUM DIRECTORS
PORT DIRECTORS
FROM:
MICHAEL D. CRONIN
ACTING ASSOCIATE COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF PROGRAMS
SUBJECT: AFM Update: Revision of March 14, 2000 Dual Intent Memorandum
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 00051801 (posted May. 18, 2000)"
U.S. Department of Justice
Immigration and Naturalization Service
HQADJ 70/ 2.8.6, 2.8.12, 10.18
AD 00-03
May 16, 2000
MEMORANDUM FOR:
REGIONAL DIRECTORS
SERVICE CENTER DIRECTORS
DISTRICT DIRECTORS
OFFICERS IN CHARGE
ASYLUM DIRECTORS
PORT DIRECTORS
FROM:
MICHAEL D. CRONIN
ACTING ASSOCIATE COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF PROGRAMS
SUBJECT: AFM Update: Revision of March 14, 2000 Dual Intent Memorandum
more...
pictures Another Word… Sleeve | Jenny On the Spot * Writer. Teacher. Funny Girl. Mom.
tomguide
10-05 04:56 PM
Hi,
I need your help on this tricky (at least for me) situation. I am a Software Developer right now and want to chanfe my job to a PM (product manager), but within the same division, same employer. Apparently the job descirption of PM (like new product functional design...) will be different from the one of developer (like new product technical design, coding...).
Right now, my GC status is: PERMLC got approved Dec/2006. I-140 was filed on Feb/2007 and still pending. I-485/AP/EAD were filed on Aug/2007 and pending.
My questions are:
1) I know the AC 21 law, say after Feb 2008(180 days after my 485 filing) and if the 140 gets approved by then too, I can do ANY job change within teh same employer or even switch to another employer, is this true? Or, I still have to stick to the similar job type(SW developer in my case), no matter within a same employer or different one?
2) Before I can use AC21, say from now to Feb2008, I know I can not switch to another employer. But can I change my job to PM with the same employer. Will this affect my 485/GC case? If so, is there any solution or workaround so that I can change my job "smartly" without affecting 485?
Thanks a lot for your help!
I need your help on this tricky (at least for me) situation. I am a Software Developer right now and want to chanfe my job to a PM (product manager), but within the same division, same employer. Apparently the job descirption of PM (like new product functional design...) will be different from the one of developer (like new product technical design, coding...).
Right now, my GC status is: PERMLC got approved Dec/2006. I-140 was filed on Feb/2007 and still pending. I-485/AP/EAD were filed on Aug/2007 and pending.
My questions are:
1) I know the AC 21 law, say after Feb 2008(180 days after my 485 filing) and if the 140 gets approved by then too, I can do ANY job change within teh same employer or even switch to another employer, is this true? Or, I still have to stick to the similar job type(SW developer in my case), no matter within a same employer or different one?
2) Before I can use AC21, say from now to Feb2008, I know I can not switch to another employer. But can I change my job to PM with the same employer. Will this affect my 485/GC case? If so, is there any solution or workaround so that I can change my job "smartly" without affecting 485?
Thanks a lot for your help!
dresses OK, so by another name this is
Photo Chef
May 18th, 2007, 11:05 AM
I guess tricks isnt the best word to use, i have had photo courses, and have had the rule of thirds pounded into my head by many a teacher ;)
I'm more interested in the shortcuts and other features of the camera and settings. I know the basics of taking a good photo, but have a lot more practice.
I'm more interested in the shortcuts and other features of the camera and settings. I know the basics of taking a good photo, but have a lot more practice.
more...
makeup Homophone: a word pronounced
apb
03-18 02:32 PM
AT JFK. Just showed AP and passport. Went through US citizen/resident line, again to separate counter and no questions. Very cool and very very friendly CBP officers.
girlfriend another word for annoying
gctoget
08-14 02:48 PM
yes
hairstyles #39;sexting#39; was even a word,
fromnaija
10-26 11:27 AM
You may find the article at http://www.visalaw.com/99oct/20oct99.html enlightening.
snathan
01-21 10:32 AM
I am on F1 status in US, My parents are green holder..... I am also planinig to do PhD..... can i apply for green card now....?..... If yes..... on what purpose and with what requierments...?
You can not file GC based on your F1 or your parent's GC. Either you should go for family based or employment based.
Family based - your parents should have Citizenship (may you need to be under 21)
Emp based - You need to have job.
or marry US Citizen.
You can not file GC based on your F1 or your parent's GC. Either you should go for family based or employment based.
Family based - your parents should have Citizenship (may you need to be under 21)
Emp based - You need to have job.
or marry US Citizen.
polk881
01-26 10:58 AM
Hi. I just e-filed my I-539, status of change request from F-1 to H-4. I just found out that I chose "North Korea" for my citizenship, while it was supposed to be "South Korea". I chose "South Korea" for the passport issuance country.
How can I fix this? Should I attach a letter explaining this, when sending the supporting documents? What else supporting documents should I submit, other than my husband(H-1)'s paystub, I-129 approval notice and our marriage certificate?
Thanks in advance.
How can I fix this? Should I attach a letter explaining this, when sending the supporting documents? What else supporting documents should I submit, other than my husband(H-1)'s paystub, I-129 approval notice and our marriage certificate?
Thanks in advance.
No comments:
Post a Comment